
Investment
Policy
| Investment Philosophy |
Spending & Investment Goals | Investment
Guidelines | Asset
Allocation
Screening | Venture
Capital & Alternative Investments | Monitoring
Examples of Foundation Investment
Policies
We
begin the endowment management process recognizing that our responsibility
does not end with maximizing return and minimizing risk. We recognize that
economic growth can come at considerable cost to community and environment.
We
believe that efforts to mitigate environmental degradation, address issues
of social justice and promote healthy communities will be successful to the
extent that these concerns are brought from the margins to the center of business
and investment decision making.
We
recognize that addressing such concerns while pursuing financial objectives
is an imperfect process. However, we believe that the development of healthier
corporate cultures, and through them a healthier economy, depends upon the
recognition of these concerns by management, directors, employees and investors.
Within foundations, this means reducing the dissonance between philanthropic
mission and endowment management.
We
believe that in light of the social, environmental and economic challenges
of our time, fiduciary responsibility in the coming decades will dictate the
integration of prudent financial management practices with principles of environmental
stewardship, concern for community, and corporate accountability to shareholders
and stakeholders alike. Foundations have a particular role to play in this
process, by coming to understand mission not only in terms of the uses of
income to fund programs, but also in terms of the ends toward which endowment
assets are managed.
(back to top)
The
environmental impact of a business is tied to the throughput of materials,
generation of waste and to the long-term value of the goods or services it
produces. Equity within a corporation derives from participatory management,
employee ownership, salary structures, workforce diversity, employee benefit
programs or other demonstrated commitments to the well-being of all individuals
involved in an enterprise. A corporation can promote community through openness
and accountability to all stakeholders, local job creation especially for
the economically disadvantaged, corporate giving to and active involvement
with community organizations, or other initiatives that provide net benefits
to the local economy.
(back to top)
The spending and investment goals of the foundation are:
We
recognize that to the extent that our grantmaking budgets, in combination
with our operating expenses, exceed investment returns over a multi-year period,
the preservation of the real value of our assets over the long-term becomes
increasingly difficult. Because the Board has determined that the foundation
should be viewed as a perpetual institution, investments that have the potential
to generate substantial long-term capital gains will be particularly important.
(back to top)
Investment guidelines are based on a 50 year horizon. Interim performance will be monitored as appropriate.
Appreciation and income may be used to finance cash requirements for grants and operating expenses. Assets may be spent down during periods in which neither appreciation nor income are sufficient to fund grantmaking budgets.
The foundation's assets will be managed by professional money managers selected by the Finance Committee in accordance with the asset allocation guidelines set forth by the Finance Committee and approved by the Board. Investment managers have complete discretion to manage the assets in each particular portfolio to best achieve investment objectives and requirements, within the social and financial guidelines set forth in the Foundation's Investment Policy. Managers will be monitored on a regular basis, as described below.
Consistent with the Foundation's Investment Policy, the responsibilities of investment managers include:
Assets will be diversified both by asset class (domestic equities, foreign equities, fixed income, venture capital, private placements and real estate) and within each asset class (by indexation vs. active management, growth vs. value, large-cap vs. small-cap, and by economic sector, industry and quality).
Asset
allocation will fall within the following ranges (as of September, 1997)
Current Target Range:
EQUITIES 50-65%: Active Domestic 21%, International 13%, Index Domestic 20%,
International Not currently available.
FIXED INCOME 24% (25-30%): Alternative Investments: Venture Capital/ Private
Equity 9% (5-20%), Absolute Return (Hedge Funds) 13% (10-20%)
(back to top)
All public equity portfolios, indexed and active, will be managed by investment managers who employ social and environmental screens in addition to traditional financial analysis in their investment decision-making. Because the screening of fixed income portfolios investments is not generally available through institutional money managers, fixed income managers will be sought who are willing to work with the Finance Committee on a case by case basis with respect to avoidance of the debt of companies whose social or environmental impacts are deemed to be adverse to the Foundation's mission.
Notwithstanding the above, the Foundation may deem it desirable to own shares of certain companies whose actions are contrary to the concerns of the Foundation's grantees, creating particular problems for communities and the environment. If, in the judgment of the Foundation, ownership of such shares will afford the Foundation the opportunity to influence the behavior of these companies, ownership positions will be maintained at minimum levels necessary to support requisite shareholder activities.
Venture capital investments will be screened, with particular attention to the use of investments in early stage private companies as a tool for shaping corporate culture and furthering the Foundation's mission. Later stage venture investments and private equity investments will be screened to the extent possible, recognizing, however, that in later stage investments the opportunities for proactive interventions in support of our mission are limited or, in the case of certain partnerships or asset classes, unavailable. In such cases the Foundation will try to assure itself that the investments will be benign in relation to its mission.
As a general rule, the Foundation will seek to have no more than 20 percent of its assets invested in asset classes in which social and environmental screening is not available. The Foundation recognizes that screening is a blunt instrument for achieving change. The screens typically employed by money managers are broad and imprecise with respect to the Foundation's mission. Companies that are deemed acceptable by many social investment screens may not be acceptable to the Foundation. Further, the impact of screening portfolios on the behavior of investee companies is generally indirect and limited. Screening has limited impact on the cost of capital to companies, although that impact might increase in the case of small cap companies and over time as the cumulative capital under management in screened accounts increases. On the positive side, interactions among committed money managers who screen, the Foundation Board and staff, and investee companies can play a role in influencing corporate behavior and changing corporate culture.
The
impact of screening on financial returns is a subject of on-going analysis,
both internally, with respect to the Foundation's own investment performance,
and externally, with respect to the social investment movement as a whole.
A number of recent studies, however, confirm the Foundation's own assessment:
the application of social and environmental screens does not significantly
affect financial performance, positively or negatively. The differences in
performance between screened and unscreened portfolios can be found in manager
selection and stock selection. The Finance Committee, however, will continue
to monitor, assess and seek to improve its understanding of the relationships
which may exist between financial returns and the impact of screening on our
mission.
In evaluating the impact of a company, we look for:
In
industries that do not meet our screens, companies that have signed the CERES
Principles or demonstrated particular leadership within their industry with
respect to social responsibility and environmental impact may be considered
on a case by case basis.
(back to top)
Because it involves investments and, in some cases, active involvement in early stage, private companies, venture capital can be a powerful tool for contributing to the Foundation's mission.
Financial objectives of venture capital and private equity investments are
to generate returns, through the realization of long-term capital gains, that
are superior to those of public markets. Investments will be sought which
provide premiums over public market returns sufficient to compensate for the
risk and illiquidity of private investments, and which, in some instances,
take into account value added to our philanthropic mission. Early stage investments
and investments that have particularly higher mission-related potential will
be balanced with later stage private equity investments which usually do not
afford opportunities for either screening or shareholder involvement.
(back to top)
The
Finance Committee will monitor the performance of the Foundation's managers
on a quarterly basis, with at least one face-to-face meeting each year. Issues
to be addressed include: Year-to-date and cumulative performance will be assessed
in terms of our screened portfolio as against other screened and nonscreened
portfolios under management, in comparison to the relevant indexes, including
the Domini Social Equity Index, and in relation to the performance of other
foundations. Social research and interactions with portfolio companies, including
shareholder activities will be reviewed. Adherence to the Foundation's screens
and values. Transactions and transaction costs. Market capitalization, portfolio
balancing and holdings overlap among managers. Systematic risk (beta) and
standard deviation (sigma) for each portfolio.
(back
to top)
Examples of Foundation Investment Policies
Please click on a policy to view:
